Review Summary
- (Peter) Missing SLES command in install guide
- Fixed
- (Peter) User guide has a few bad links and out of date information
- Will most likely be removed – resolve before end of testing
- (Peter) Test plan references SVN install guide which doesn't display correctly in browsers
- Test plan now points to development repository instructions that display correctly.
- (Shava) Test plan doesn't specify that CentOS 7 packages are available and should be tested
- Test plan modified
- (Shava) Add more description to Test 6
- Test plan modified
- (David) Test 5 instructions are confusing
- Test plan modified
Review Input Documents
Materials for SDIACT-202 are linked below and have been checked into SVN at:
https://software.xsede.org/svn/sdi/activities/sdiact-202/trunk/
Software (use the latest revision below)
- http://software.xsede.org/development/gsi-openssh-server-xsede/ (version 7.1p2e-7)
Documentation
- Introduction
- Design/Security overview
- Installation guide
- Deployment Plan (Draft for Operations)
- User guide
- Defect, issue, and risk reporting
- See SDIACT-202 test plan below
- Acceptance test plan
- Testing resources
- SD&I - CentOS 6 - RPM install - hpcdev-pub04.sdsc.edu
- PSC - CentOS 7 - RPM install - PSC machine
- TACC - CentOS 6 - Targz install - stampede.tacc.xsede.org
Review Criteria
Package information: All software packages (e.g., server and client packages) for this CI are listed.
Documentation and Installation instructions: The deployment plan for this CI on XSEDE is clearly described as well as the installation instructions and any XSEDE specific configuration instructions.
Test environment and facilities: The test environment needed to adequately to validate this component is described. Should indicate also whether testing can be performed within a VM and if not, the reasons for it.
Assumptions: Lists any assumptions needed before testing can begin (e.g., accounts needed).
Test procedures, cases, and scenarios: Lists the tests that should be run or an associated test suite and expected performance metrics if applicable.
Defect, issue, and risk reporting: Deployment plans should include defect and issue reporting information. The testing plan could reference that same information from the deployment plan, or provide alternate information if defects and issues need to be reported differently during testing. Risks, as well as defects and issues, should be part of the testing report.
Schedule
Current Date: 2023-05-29Current Status: Closed (Test Readiness Review)
Target Date | Actual Date | Activity Milestone |
---|---|---|
2016-05-10 | Review launch date | |
2016-05-17 | Written feedback due (Reviewers) | |
2016-05-19 | 2016-05-19 | Written response date (Review Material Developers) |
2016-05-20 | 2016-05-19 | Final approval due and completion date (Reviewers) |
Review Last Updated: 2016-05-19 2:27 pm
Reviewers
If you are a reviewer, please login to sign or withdraw from this review.
Required
- David Carver
SIGNED: 2016-05-16 17:09 - Peter Enstrom
SIGNED: 2016-05-17 15:51 - Bryon Gill
SIGNED: 2016-05-13 11:19 - Shava Smallen
SIGNED: 2016-05-17 12:01
Optional
- Maytal Dahan
Review Material Developers
Venkatesh Yekkirala
Review Facilitator
Shava Smallen