Overview
CILogon provides XSEDE users certificates that they can use to authenticate to XSEDE SPs using their campus InCommon credentials. This is just another way of authenticating to XSEDE SPs and thus does NOT replace the standard authentication mechanisms that XSEDE users use. SDIACT-239 enhances the CILogon service to support the OAuth 2.0 protocol.
Review Summary
- (Shava) Old deployment plan format
- Developer revised deployment plan using current template
- (Susan) Google links on CILogin doc page are invalid
- Not yet fixed – needs to be fixed before end of testing
- (Susan) Following links in CILogon page sometimes opens up a new window and sometimes not – be consistent
- Not yet fixed – needs to be fixed before end of testing
- (Shava) Prerequisites for Test Machine not specified
- Developer added sudo requirement
Review Input Documents
Software (use the latest revision below)
- Already deployed to CILogon.org
Documentation
- Introduction
- Design/Security overview
- Installation guide
- n/a
- Deployment Plan
- User guide
- Defect, issue, and risk reporting
- See SDIACT-239 test plan below
- Acceptance test plan
- Testing resources
- hpcdev-pub04.sdsc.edu (CentOS 6 - Galen)
- PSC node (CentOS 7 - Susan)
Review Criteria
Package information: All software packages (e.g., server and client packages) for this CI are listed.
Documentation and Installation instructions: The deployment plan for this CI on XSEDE is clearly described as well as the installation instructions and any XSEDE specific configuration instructions.
Test environment and facilities: The test environment needed to adequately to validate this component is described. Should indicate also whether testing can be performed within a VM and if not, the reasons for it.
Assumptions: Lists any assumptions needed before testing can begin (e.g., accounts needed).
Test procedures, cases, and scenarios: Lists the tests that should be run or an associated test suite and expected performance metrics if applicable.
Defect, issue, and risk reporting: Deployment plans should include defect and issue reporting information. The testing plan could reference that same information from the deployment plan, or provide alternate information if defects and issues need to be reported differently during testing. Risks, as well as defects and issues, should be part of the testing report.
Schedule
Current Date: 2023-05-29Current Status: Closed (Test Readiness Review)
Target Date | Actual Date | Activity Milestone |
---|---|---|
2016-07-26 | Review launch date | |
2016-08-02 | Written feedback due (Reviewers) | |
2016-08-03 | 2016-08-11 | Written response date (Review Material Developers) |
2016-08-04 | 2016-08-11 | Final approval due and completion date (Reviewers) |
Review Last Updated: 2016-08-11 8:16 am
Reviewers
If you are a reviewer, please login to sign or withdraw from this review.
Required
- Susan Litzinger
SIGNED: 2016-07-29 14:31 - Shava Smallen
SIGNED: 2016-08-11 11:38 - Choonhan Youn
SIGNED: 2016-07-26 13:32
Review Material Developers
Venkatesh Yekkirala
Review Facilitator
Shava Smallen